fbpx
วิกิพีเดีย

การเลือกตั้งประธานาธิบดีสหรัฐในรัฐเพนซิลเวเนีย พ.ศ. 2563

การเลือกตั้งประธานาธิบดีสหรัฐในรัฐเพนซิลเวเนีย พ.ศ. 2563 จัดขึ้นในวันอังคารที่ 3 พฤศจิกายน พ.ศ. 2563 เป็นส่วนหนึ่งของการเลือกตั้งประธานาธิบดีสหรัฐ พ.ศ. 2563 ที่รัฐทั้ง 50 รัฐและเขตโคลัมเบียจะเข้าร่วม รัฐเพนซิลเวเนียและเลือกประธานาธิบดีในคณะผู้เลือกตั้งตามคะแนนความนิยม รัฐเพนซิลเวเนียมี 20 เสียงในคณะผู้เลือกตั้ง ในวันที่ 7 พฤศจิกายนมีการคาดการณ์ว่าไบเดินชนะการเลือกตั้งในรัฐเพนซิลเวเนียและเขาได้รับการประกาศให้เป็นผู้ชนะการเลือกตั้ง

การเลือกตั้งประธานาธิบดีสหรัฐในรัฐเพนซิลเวเนีย พ.ศ. 2563

← 2016 3 พฤศจิกายน พ.ศ.2563 2024 →
ผู้ใช้สิทธิ%
คะแนนเสียง
99%
ณ เวลา Nov. 19, 2020 3:21 pm EST
 
ผู้ท้าชิง โจ ไบเดิน ดอนัลด์ ทรัมป์
พรรค เดโมแครต ริพับลิกัน
รัฐเหย้า เดลาแวร์ ฟลอริดา
คู่สมัคร กมลา แฮร์ริส ไมก์ เพนซ์
คะแนนคณะผู้เลือกตั้ง 20 0
คะแนนเสียง 3,456,632 3,375,636
ร้อยละ 49.97% 48.79%

ประธานาธิบดีก่อนการเลือกตั้ง

ดอนัลด์ ทรัมป์
ริพับลิกัน

ว่าที่ประธานาธิบดี

โจ ไบเดิน
เดโมแครต

การคาดการณ์

ที่มา อันดับ วันที่
Princeton Electoral Consortium Safe D (พลิกชนะ) 5 ตุลาคม พ.ศ.2563
The Cook Political Report Lean D (พลิกชนะ) 5 ตุลาคม พ.ศ.2563
Inside Elections Lean D (พลิกชนะ) 5 ตุลาคม พ.ศ.2563
Sabato's Crystal Ball Lean D (พลิกชนะ) 5 ตุลาคม พ.ศ.2563
Politico Lean D (พลิกชนะ) 5 ตุลาคม พ.ศ.2563
RCP Tossup 5 ตุลาคม พ.ศ.2563
Niskanen Likely D (พลิกชนะ) 5 ตุลาคม พ.ศ.2563
CNN Lean D (พลิกชนะ) 23 ตุลาคม พ.ศ.2563
The Economist Likely D (พลิกชนะ) 5 ตุลาคม พ.ศ.2563
CBS News Lean D (พลิกชนะ) 5 ตุลาคม พ.ศ.2563
270towin Lean D (พลิกชนะ) 5 ตุลาคม พ.ศ.2563
ABC News Likely D (พลิกชนะ) 5 ตุลาคม พ.ศ.2563
NPR Lean D (พลิกชนะ) 5 ตุลาคม พ.ศ.2563
NBC News Lean D (พลิกชนะ) 5 ตุลาคม พ.ศ.2563
538 Likely D (พลิกชนะ) 5 ตุลาคม พ.ศ.2563

การสำรวจ

การสรุปโดยกราฟ

การสำรวจโดยรวม

Source of poll
aggregation
Dates
administered
Dates
updated
Joe
Biden

Democratic
Donald
Trump

Republican
Other/
Undecided
Margin
270 to Win October 22 – November 2, 2020 November 3, 2020 49.4% 45.7% 4.9% Biden +3.7
Real Clear Politics October 29–November 2, 2020 November 3, 2020 48.7% 47.5% 3.8% Biden +1.2
FiveThirtyEight until November 2, 2020 November 3, 2020 50.2% 45.6% 4.2% Biden +4.6
Average 49.4% 46.3% 4.3% Biden +3.1

แบบสำรวจ

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin
of error
Donald
Trump

Republican
Joe
Biden

Democratic
Jo
Jorgensen
Libertarian
Howie
Hawkins
Green
Other Undecided
Susquehanna Polling & Research Inc. Nov 1–2 499 (LV) ± 4.3% 49% 48% 1% - 0% 0%
Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports Oct 31 – Nov 1 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 47% 50% - - 1%
Research Co. Oct 31 – Nov 1 450 (LV) ± 4.6% 46% 52% - - 2% 4%
AYTM/Aspiration Oct 30 – Nov 1 340 (LV) 49% 51% - -
Change Research/CNBC Oct 29 – Nov 1 699 (LV) ± 3.71% 46% 50% 2% - 2%
Marist College/NBC Oct 29 – Nov 1 772 (LV) ± 4.4% 46% 51% - - 1% 2%
Monmouth University Oct 28 – Nov 1 502(RV) ± 4.4% 45% 50% 1% - 0% 4%
502 (LV) 44% 51% - -
45% 50% - -
Swayable Oct 27 – Nov 1 1,107 (LV) ± 3.9% 48% 50% 2% -
Data for Progress Oct 27 – Nov 1 1,417 (LV) ± 2.6% 45% 52% 2% 0% 0%
Ipsos/Reuters Oct 27 – Nov 1 673 (LV) ± 4.3% 45% 51% 1% 1% 2%
44% 51% - - 3% 2%
46% 52% - - 2%
Trafalgar Oct 30–31 1,062 (LV) ± 2.93% 48% 46% 2% - 1% 4%
Frederick Polls/Compete Everywhere Oct 30–31 879 (LV) ± 3% 48% 52% - -
Insider Advantage/Center for American Greatness Oct 30–31 500 (LV) ± 4.4% 48.7% 47.4% 1.3% - 2.6%
Siena College/NYT Upshot Oct 26–31 1,862 (LV) ± 2.4% 43% 49% 2% - 0% 5%
Morning Consult Oct 22–31 2,686 (LV) ± 2% 43% 52% - -
Emerson College Oct 29–30 823 (LV) ± 3.3% 47% 52% - - 2%
AtlasIntel Oct 29–30 672 (LV) ± 4% 50% 49% - - 2%
Targoz Market Research/PollSmart Oct 25–30 998 (LV) 42% 56% - - 2%
Public Policy Polling/American Bridge PAC Oct 28–29 1,012 (V) 45% 52% - - 3%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies Oct 26–29 2,125 (LV) 45% 50% 1% - 1% 3%
Harvard-Harris/The Hill Oct 26–29 901 (LV) 46% 51% - - 3%
ABC/Washington Post Oct 24–29 824 (LV) ± 4% 44% 51% 3% - 0% 1%
Muhlenberg College/Morning Call Oct 23–28 419 (LV) ± 5.5% 44% 49% - - 4% 2%
SurveyMonkey/Axios Oct 1–28 10,599 (LV) ± 1.5% 46% 52% - - -
RMG Research/PoliticalIQ Oct 25–27 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 45% 51% - - 2% 2%
44% 52% - - 2% 2%
47% 49% - - 2% 2%
Quinnipiac University Oct 23–27 1,324 (LV) ± 2.7% 44% 51% - - 1% 4%
Swayable Oct 23–26 491 (LV) ± 6% 46% 52% 2% -
Civiqs/Daily Kos Oct 23–26 1,145 (LV) ± 3% 45% 52% - - 2% 1%
Ipsos/Reuters Oct 20–26 655 (LV) ± 4.4% 44% 51% 3% 0% 1%
45% 50% - - 3% 2%
Insider Advantage/Center for American Greatness Oct 25 400 (LV) ± 4.9% 48.5% 45.5% 3.3% - 2.8%
Trafalgar Group Oct 24–25 1,076 (LV) ± 2.91% 48% 48% 2% - 1% 1%
Wick Surveys Oct 24–25 1,000 (LV) ± 3.1% 49% 47% - -
Franklin & Marshall College Oct 19–25 558 (LV) ± 5% 44% 50% 2% - 1% 3%
Univision/University of Houston/Latino
Decisions/North Star Opinion Research
Oct 17–25 723 (RV) ± 3.64% 45% 50% - - 3% 2%
Gravis Marketing Oct 23 602 (LV) ± 4% 44% 51% - - 5%
Public Policy Polling/American Bridge PAC Oct 21–22 980 (V) 46% 51% - - 4%
Civiqs/Dan Hopkins Oct 17–21 1,577 (A) 3% 46% 52% - - 2%
YouGov/University of Wisconsin-Madison Oct 13–21 669 (LV) ± 4.45% 44% 52% - - 3%
Citizen Data Oct 17–20 1,000 (LV) ± 3.1% 39% 44% 9% 0% 1% 7%
CNN/SSRS Oct 15–20 843 (LV) ± 4% 43% 53% 2% - 1% 1%
Muhlenberg College/Morning Call Oct 13–20 416 (LV) ± 5.5% 44% 51% - - 2% 4%
Morning Consult Oct 11–20 2,563 (LV) ± 1.9% 43% 52% - -
Fox News Oct 18–19 1,045 (LV) ± 3% 45% 50% 1% - 1% 2%
Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports Oct 18–19 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 47% 50% - - 2% 3%
Quinnipiac University Oct 16–19 1,241 (LV) ± 2.8% 43% 51% - - 1% 5%
Change Research/CNBC Oct 16–19 574 (LV) 47% 49% - -
Suffolk University/USA Today[1] Oct 15–19 500 (LV) ± 4.4% 42% 49% 1% - 4% 4%
Ipsos/Reuters Oct 13–19 653 (LV) ± 4.4% 45% 49% 2% 0% 3%
45% 49% - - 3% 4%
Trafalgar Group/Restoration PAC Oct 13–15 1,041 (LV) ± 2.96% 46% 48% 3% - 2% 2%
HarrisX/The Hill Oct 12–15 1,289 (LV) 46% 51% - -
Insider Advantage/Center for American Greatness Oct 12–13 400 (LV) ± 4.9% 43% 46% 2% - 9%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies Oct 10–13 1,289 (LV) 43% 51% 1% 0%
Trafalgar Group Oct 10–12 1,034 (LV) ± 2.97% 45% 47% 3% - 3% 2%
RMG Research/PoliticalIQ Oct 7–12 800 (LV) 43% 49% 1% 1% 6%
42% 50% 1% 1% 6%
45% 47% 1% 1% 6%
Civiqs/Rust Belt Rising Oct 8–11 600 (LV) ± 4.2% 45% 52% - - 2% 1%
Ipsos/Reuters Oct 6–11 622 (LV) ± 4.5% 45% 51% 1% 0% 2%
44% 51% - - 1% 4%
Morning Consult Oct 2–11 2,610 (LV) ± 1.9% 44% 52% - -
Redfield & Wilton Strategies Oct 9–10 1,145 (LV) 44% 49% 1% -
Whitman Insight Strategies Oct 5–9 517 (LV) ± 4.3% 46% 51% - - 1% 3%
Baldwin Wallace University Sep 30 – Oct 8 1,140 (LV) ± 3.1% 45% 50% 1% 0% 0% 4%
YouGov/CCES Sep 29 – Oct 7 2,703 (LV) 44% 52% - -
Redfield & Wilton Strategies Oct 4–6 927 (LV) ± 3.22% 42% 49% 1% - 1% 7%
Emerson College Oct 4–5 688 (LV) ± 3.7% 47% 51% - - 2%
Quinnipiac University Oct 1–5 1,211 (LV) ± 2.8% 41% 54% - - 1% 3%
Ipsos/Reuters Sep 29 – Oct 5 605 (LV) ± 4.5% 45% 50% - - 2% 3%
Change Research/CNBC Oct 2–4 468 (LV) 46% 50% - -
Monmouth University Sep 30 – Oct 4 500 (RV) ± 4.4% 42% 54% 1% - 0% 2%
500 (LV) 43% 54% - -
45% 53% - -
YouGov/CBS Sep 30 – Oct 2 1,287 (LV) ± 3.2% 44% 51% - - 2% 5%
Siena College/NYT Upshot Sep 30 – Oct 2 706 (LV) ± 4.1% 42% 49% 3% - 0% 5%
SurveyMonkey/Axios Sep 1–30 4,613 (LV) 46% 52% - - 2%
ABC News/Washington Post Sep 21–26 567 (LV) ± 5.0% 45% 54% - - 0% 1%
Siena College/NYT Upshot Sep 25–27 711 (LV) ± 4.3% 40% 49% 2% - 0% 8%
TIPP/The Federalist Sep 24–26 774 (LV) ± 3.6% 45% 50% - - 1% 4%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies Sep 23–25 1,015 (LV) ± 3.08% 44% 50% 0% 1% 5%
Fox News Sep 20–23 856 (LV) ± 3% 44% 51% 2% 1% 2%
910 (RV) ± 3% 43% 51% 2% 2% 3%
Baldwin Wallace University Sep 9–22 1,012 (LV) ± 3.6% 45% 47% 2% 0% 1% 5%
Trafalgar Group/Restoration PAC Sep 18–21 1,006 (LV) ± 2.99% 46% 48% 1% 1% 2% 2%
YouGov/UW-Madison Elections Research
Center/Wisconsin State Journal
Sep 10–21 642 (LV) 45% 49% - -
Change Research/CNBC Sep 18–20 579 (LV) 45% 49% - -
Franklin & Marshall College Sep 14–20 480 (LV) ± 7.8% 42% 48% - -
Hart Research Associates/Human Rights Campaign Sep 17–19 400 (LV) ± 4.9% 42% 53% - -
CPEC Sep 15–17 830 (LV) ± 2.3% 45% 50% - - 1% 4%
Trafalgar Group (R) Sep 15–17 1,006 (LV) ± 2.99% 45% 47% 2% 1% 2% 2%
Ipsos/Reuters Sep 11–16 611 (LV) ± 4.5% 46% 49% - - 2% 4%
Civiqs/Rust Belt Rising Sep 11–15 704 (RV) ± 4.4% 45% 52% - - 1% 2%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies Sep 12–14 1,036 (LV) ± 3.04% 44% 49% 1% 1% 0% 5%
Climate Nexus Sep 8–11 659 (RV) ± 4% 43% 48% - - 3% 6%
Benenson Strategy Group/GS Strategy Group/AARP Aug 28 – Sep 8 1,600 (LV) ± 2.5% 46% 49% - - 1% 4%
Marist College/NBC News Aug 31 – Sep 7 771 (LV) ± 4.4% 44% 53% - - 1% 2%
Morning Consult Aug 29 – Sep 7 2,227 (LV) ± (2%-4%) 45% 50% - -
Change Research/CNBC Sep 4–6 829 (LV) 46% 50% - - 4%
TargetSmart Sep 3–6 835 (LV) ± 3.4% 44% 51% - - 3% 3%
Susquehanna Polling & Research Inc. Aug 26 – Sep 4 498 (LV) ± 4.3% 42% 44% - - 6% 7%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies Aug 30 – Sep 3 1,053 (LV) ± 3.02% 43% 48% 1% 1% 1% 7%
Quinnipiac Aug 28 – Sep 1 1,235 (LV) ± 3% 44% 52% - - 1% 3%
ALG Research/Progressive Policy Institute Aug 26 – Sep 1 500 (LV) 44% 50% - -
Monmouth University Aug 28–31 400 (RV) ± 4.9% 45% 49% 2% 0% 1% 4%
400 (LV) 46% 49% - - 2% 3%
47% 48% - - 2% 3%
Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC Aug 26–31 600 (LV) 45% 51% - - 4%
SurveyMonkey/Axios Aug 1–31 3,531 (LV) 45% 53% - - 2%
Morning Consult Aug 21–30 2,158 (LV) ± (2%–4%) 45% 49% - -
Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports Aug 25–27 1,000 (LV) ± 3% 48% 48% - - 4%
GQR Research/Unite the Country PAC Aug 20–24 971 (LV) ± 4.4% 43% 52% - - 5%
Franklin & Marshall College Aug 17–24 681 (RV) ± 5.2% 42% 50% - - 3% 7%
Change Research/CNBC Aug 21–23 984 (LV) 46% 49% - -
Global Strategy Group/Climate Power 2020
/League of Conservation Voters/Sierra Club
Aug 13–19 801 (RV) ± 3.5% 42% 50% 2% 1% 5%
43% 53% - - 4%
Redfield and Wilton Strategies Aug 16–17 1,006 (LV) ± 3.1% 41% 48% 1% 1% 1% 8%
Civiqs/Rust Belt Rising Aug 13–17 617 (RV) 44% 51% - - 3% 1%
Muhlenberg College/Morning Call Aug 11–17 416 (LV) ± 5.5% 45% 49% - - 3% 3%
Morning Consult Aug 7–16 1,777 (LV) ± (2%–4%) 44% 50% - -
Emerson College Aug 8–10 843 (LV) ± 3.8% 47% 53% - -
Change Research/CNBC Aug 7–9 456 (RV) 44% 48% - -
YouGov/CBS Aug 4–7 1,211 (LV) ± 3.7% 43% 49% - - 3% 5%
OnMessage Inc./Heritage Action Aug 2–4 400 (LV) ± 4.7% 46% 50% - - 4%
YouGov/University of Wisconsin-Madison Jul 27 – Aug 6 742 (RV) ± 4.9% 41% 50% - - 2% 5%
SurveyMonkey/Axios Jul 1–31 4,208 (LV) 48% 50% - - 2%
Change Research/CNBC Jul 24–26 382 (LV) 46% 48% - -
Franklin & Marshall College Jul 20–26 667 (RV) ± 5.5% 41% 50% - - 2% 6%
Morning Consult Jul 17–26 2,092 (LV) ± 2.1% 42% 50% - -
Gravis Marketing Jul 22–24 1,006 (RV) ± 3.1% 45% 48% - - 8%
Zogby Analytics Jul 21–23 809 (RV) ± 3.4% 43% 44% 4% 2% - 8%
Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC Jul 17–22 600 (LV) 45% 51% - - 5%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies Jul 19–21 1,016 (LV) 41% 48% 1% 0% 2% 8%
Fox News Jul 18–20 793 (RV) ± 3.5% 39% 50% - - 5% 6%
Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports/American Greatness PAC Jul 15–16 750 (LV) ± 4% 46% 51% - - 2% 1%
Spry Strategies/American Principles Project Jul 11–16 700 (LV) ± 3.7% 48% 47% - - 5%
Monmouth University Jul 9–13 401 (RV) ± 4.9% 40% 53% - - 3% 4%
401 (LV) 42% 52% - - 3% 3%
44% 51% - - 2% 3%
Change Research/CNBC Jul 10–12 743 (LV) 42% 50% - -
Trafalgar Group Jun 29 – Jul 2 1,062 (LV) ± 2.92% 43% 48% - - 6% 3%
SurveyMonkey/Axios Jun 8–30 2,184 (LV) 48% 50% - - 2%
Change Research/CNBC Jun 26–28 760 (LV) 44% 50% - -
Susquehanna Polling/Fox 43 Jun 15–23 715 (LV) 41% 46% - - 5% 8%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies Jun 14–16 1,125 (LV) ± 2.92% 39% 49% 1% 1% 1% 9%
Siena College/NYT Upshot Jun 8–16 651 (RV) ± 4.2% 40% 50% - - 3% 6%
Change Research/CNBC Jun 12–14 491 (LV) 46% 49% - - 3%
Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC Jun 8–11 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 42% 54% - - 4%
Civiqs/Dan Hopkins Jun 6–11 1,221 (A) 3.6% 46% 49% - - 5%
Civiqs/Dan Hopkins May 30 – Jun 2 2,045 (A) 2.4% 46% 49% - - 5%
Change Research/CNBC May 29–31 579 (LV) 50% 46% - - 2% 2%
Morning Consult May 17–26 2,120 (LV) 44% 48% - -
Redfield & Wilton Strategies May 10–14 963 (LV) ± 3.2% 39% 48% - - 2% 11%
Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC May 9–13 600 (LV) ± 3.0% 51% 46% - - 4%
Harper Polling (R) Apr 21–26 644 (LV) ± 3.9% 43% 49% - - 8%
Public Policy Polling Apr 20–21 1,251 (RV) 44% 51% - - 5%
Fox News Apr 18–21 803 (RV) ± 3.5 % 42% 50% - -
Ipsos Apr 15–20 578 (RV) ± 5.0% 40% 46% - -
Suquehanna Research/Fox 43 Apr 14–20 693 (LV) 42% 48% - -
Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC Apr 16–18 600 (RV) ± 3.0% 47% 47% - - 6%
Civiqs/Dan Hopkins Apr 4–8 1,912 (A) 2.5% 47% 47% - - 6%
Baldwin Wallace University Great Lakes Mar 17–25 973 (RV) ± 3.9% 47% 45% - - 9%
Change Research Mar 21–23 510 (LV) 50% 47% - - 4%
Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC Mar 19–21 600 (RV) 47% 45% - -
Civiqs/Dan Hopkins Mar 14–18 1,589 (A) 2.7% 48% 46% - - 6%
YouGov/Yahoo News Mar 6–8 725 (RV) 40% 46% - - 5% 8%
Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Mar 5–7 533 (RV) ± 5.3 % 45% 44% - -
Civiqs/Dan Hopkins Feb 27 – Mar 3 2,462 (A) 2.2% 48% 46% - - 7%
Muhlenberg College/Morning Call Feb 12–20 424 (RV) ± 5.5% 47% 47% - - 2% 4%
YouGov Feb 11–20 1,171 (RV) ± 4.0 % 45% 46% - -
Quinnipiac University Feb 12–18 849 (RV) ± 3.4 % 42% 50% - - 6% 3%
Expedition Strategies/Progressive Policies Institute Feb 6–18 500 (RV) 42% 47% - - 11%


ผล

การเลือกตั้งประธานาธิบดีสหรัฐในรัฐเพนซิลเวเนีย พ.ศ. 2563
พรรค ผู้สมัคร คะแนนเสียง % ±
เดโมแครต Joe Biden
Kamala Harris
3,450,696 49.98% +2.52%
ริพับลิกัน Donald Trump
Mike Pence
3,368,278 48.78% -0.4%
ลิเบอร์เทเรียน Jo Jorgensen
Spike Cohen
79,186 1.15% -1.23%
เขียนลง 6,680 0.10% -0.11%
Total votes 6,904,840

หมายเหตุ

Partisan clients
  1. Compete Everywhere primarily supports Democratic candidates
  2. The Center for American Greatness is a pro-Trump organization
  3. Climate Power 2020 was created by the League of Conservation Voters, which endorsed Biden prior to the sampling period
  4. The American Bridge PAC exclusively supports Democratic candidates
  5. The Restoration PAC is a 501 non-profit which supports Donald Trump's 2020 presidential campaign
  6. Rust Belt Rising is affiliated with the Democratic Party
  7. The Human Rights Campaign endorsed Biden prior to this poll's sampling period
  8. CPEC campaigns exclusively for Democratic candidates
  9. The Progressive Policy Institute endorsed Biden prior to this poll's sampling period
  10. Unite the Country PAC endorsed Biden prior to this poll's sampling period
  11. The League of Conservation Voters and the Sierra Club endorsed Biden prior to this poll's sampling period
  12. Heritage Action is the sister organisation of the Heritage Foundation, which exclusively endorses Republican candidates
  13. This poll's sponsor is the American Principles Project, a 501(c)(4) organization that supports the Republican Party.
  14. Poll sponsored by Protect Our Care, a pro-Affordable Care Act organisation
Additional candidates
  1. Calculated by taking the difference of 100% and all other candidates combined.
  2. Key:
    A – all adults
    RV – registered voters
    LV – likely voters
    V – unclear
  3. With voters who lean towards a given candidate
  4. Would not vote with 0%
  5. With voters who lean towards a given candidate
  6. "Some other candidate" with 1%
  7. "Someone else" with 2%
  8. "Other candidate" and "No one" with 0%
  9. With a likely voter turnout model featuring high turnout
  10. With a likely voter turnout model featuring low turnout
  11. "Other candidate or write-in" with 0%
  12. Standard VI response
  13. West (B) with 2%; "Some other candidate" and would not vote with 0%
  14. If only Biden, Trump and "some other candidate" were available
  15. "Some other candidate" with 3%; would not vote with 0%
  16. Results considering those who lean towards a given candidate among those initially predisposed towards abstention, indecision or a candidate besides Biden or Trump in the response section immediately above
  17. "Some other candidate" with 2%
  18. "Someone else" with 1%
  19. "Someone else" and would not vote with 0%
  20. Includes "Refused"
  21. With voters who lean towards a given candidate
  22. "Someone else" with 2%
  23. "Not sure/Someone else/Undecided" with 2%
  24. "None of these" and "Other" with 0%; would not vote with no voters
  25. "Neither/other" with 4%
  26. Results generated with high Democratic turnout model
  27. Results generated with high Republican turnout model
  28. "Someone else" with 1%
  29. "Someone else" with 2%
  30. "Some other candidate" with 1%; West (B) and would not vote with 0%
  31. If only Biden, Trump and "some other candidate" were available
  32. "Some other candidate" with 3%; would not vote with 0%
  33. "Someone else" with 1%
  34. "Refused" with 1%; "Some other candidate" with 0%
  35. "Someone else" with 3%
  36. Includes Undecided
  37. "Other" with 1%; "None of these" with 0%
  38. "Neither/other" with 2%
  39. "Other" with 1%; would not vote with no voters
  40. "Some other candidate" with 2%
  41. "Someone else" with 1%
  42. Additional data sourced from FiveThirtyEight
  43. "Refused" with 3%; "Others" with 1%
  44. "Some other candidate" with 2%; West (B) with 1%; would not vote with 0%
  45. If only Biden, Trump and "some other candidate" were available
  46. "Some other candidate" with 3%; would not vote with 0%
  47. "Someone else" with 2%
  48. "Someone else" with 3%
  49. Results generated with high Democratic turnout model
  50. Results generated with high Republican turnout model
  51. "Someone else" with 2%
  52. "Some other candidate" and would not vote with 1%; West (B) with 0%
  53. If only Biden, Trump and "some other candidate" were available
  54. "Some other candidate" with 1%; would not vote with 0%
  55. "Someone else" with 1%
  56. "Another candidate" with 0%
  57. "Another Third Party/Write-in" with 1%
  58. With voters who lean towards a given candidate
  59. "Someone else" with 2%
  60. "Someone else" with 1%
  61. "Some other candidate" with 2%; would not vote with 0%
  62. "Other candidate" and "No one" with 0%
  63. With a likely voter turnout model featuring high turnout
  64. With a likely voter turnout model featuring low turnout
  65. "Someone else/third party" with 2%
  66. "Someone else" and would not vote with 0%
  67. Includes "Refused"
  68. "Neither" and "Other" with 0%; would not vote with no voters
  69. "Someone else" and would not vote with 0%
  70. Includes "Refused"
  71. "Other" with 1%; "Prefer not to answer" with 0%
  72. "Another Third Party/Write-in" with 1%
  73. "Other" with 1%; would not vote with no voters
  74. "Other" and would not vote with 1%
  75. "Another candidate" with 1%
  76. "Someone else" with 2%
  77. "Third party candidate" with 1%
  78. "Someone else" with 2%
  79. "Some other candidate" with 2%; would not vote with 0%
  80. "Someone else" with 1%
  81. "Another Third Party/Write-in" with 0%
  82. "Neither candidate or other candidate" with 3%
  83. Would not vote with 1%
  84. Overlapping sample with the previous Morning Consult poll, but more information available regarding sample size
  85. "Other/not sure" with 4%
  86. "Other" and "Refused" with 3%
  87. "Another Third Party/Write-in" with 1%
  88. "Someone else" with 1%
  89. "No one" with 1%; "Other candidate" with no voters
  90. With a likely voter turnout model featuring higher turnout than in the 2016 presidential election
  91. With a likely voter turnout model featuring lower turnout than in the 2016 presidential election
  92. Additional data sourced from FiveThirtyEight; with voters who lean towards a given candidate
  93. "Some other candidate" with 4%
  94. With voters who lean towards a given candidate
  95. "Some other candidate" with 3%
  96. If only Biden and Trump were candidates
  97. "Another Third Party/Write-in" with 1%
  98. "Someone else" with 3%
  99. "Neither/other" with 3%
  100. Including voters who lean towards a given candidate
  101. "Someone else/third party" with 3%
  102. "Other" with 2%; would not vote with 0%
  103. "Some other candidate" with 2%
  104. West (B) and "Another Third Party/Write-In" with 1%
  105. "Other" with 4%; would not vote with 1%
  106. "Some other candidate" with 2%
  107. "Another candidate" with 3%; "No one" with 0%
  108. With a likely voter turnout model featuring higher turnout than in the 2016 presidential election
  109. With a likely voter turnout model featuring lower turnout than in the 2016 presidential election
  110. "Other party candidate" with 6%
  111. "other" with 1%
  112. "Another candidate" with 2%; would not vote with 1%
  113. "Libertarian Party candidate/Green Party candidate" with 3%
  114. "Third party/write-in" with 2%
  115. "Other" with 2%; would not vote with 3%
  116. "Someone else" with 1%; would not vote with 5%

อ้างอิง

  1. "Pennsylvania Election Results 2020". The New York Times. สืบค้นเมื่อ 5 November 2020.
  2. Kelly, Ben (August 13, 2018). "US elections key dates: When are the 2018 midterms and the 2020 presidential campaign?". The Independent. สืบค้นเมื่อ January 3, 2019.
  3. "Distribution of Electoral Votes". National Archives and Records Administration. สืบค้นเมื่อ January 3, 2019.
  4. CNN, Stephen Collinson and Maeve Reston. "Biden wins Pennsylvania, becoming the 46th president of the United States". CNN. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2020-11-07.
  5. "2020 Electoral Maps from Princeton Election Consortium". Princeton University (ภาษาอังกฤษ). สืบค้นเมื่อ 2020-09-22.
  6. "2020 POTUS Race ratings" (PDF). The Cook Political Report (ภาษาอังกฤษ). สืบค้นเมื่อ 2019-05-21.
  7. "POTUS Ratings | Inside Elections". insideelections.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2019-05-21.
  8. "Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball » 2020 President". crystalball.centerforpolitics.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2019-05-21.
  9. "2020 Election Forecast". Politico. November 19, 2019.
  10. "Battle for White House". RCP. April 19, 2019.
  11. 2020 Bitecofer Model Electoral College Predictions, Niskanen Center, March 24, 2020, retrieved: April 19, 2020
  12. David Chalian; Terence Burlij. "Road to 270: CNN's debut Electoral College map for 2020". CNN. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2020-06-16.
  13. "Forecasting the US elections". The Economist. สืบค้นเมื่อ 7 July 2020.
  14. "2020 Election Battleground Tracker". CBS News. July 12, 2020. สืบค้นเมื่อ July 13, 2020.
  15. "2020 Presidential Election Interactive Map". 270 to Win.
  16. "ABC News Race Ratings". ABC News. July 24, 2020. สืบค้นเมื่อ July 24, 2020.
  17. "2020 Electoral Map Ratings: Trump Slides, Biden Advantage Expands Over 270 Votes". NPR.org (ภาษาอังกฤษ). สืบค้นเมื่อ 2020-08-03.
  18. "Biden dominates the electoral map, but here's how the race could tighten". NBC News (ภาษาอังกฤษ). สืบค้นเมื่อ 2020-08-06.
  19. "2020 Election Forecast". FiveThirtyEight. สืบค้นเมื่อ 14 August 2020.
  20. "Pennsylvania 2020 General Election". Green Papers. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2020-09-17.

การเล, อกต, งประธานาธ, บด, สหร, ฐในร, ฐเพนซ, ลเวเน, 2563, ดข, นในว, นอ, งคารท, พฤศจ, กายน, 2563, เป, นส, วนหน, งของการเล, อกต, งประธานาธ, บด, สหร, 2563, ฐท, ฐและเขตโคล, มเบ, ยจะเข, าร, วม, ฐเพนซ, ลเวเน, ยและเล, อกประธานาธ, บด, ในคณะผ, เล, อกต, งตามคะแนนความน, . kareluxktngprathanathibdishrthinrthephnsileweniy ph s 2563 cdkhuninwnxngkharthi 3 phvscikayn ph s 2563 epnswnhnungkhxngkareluxktngprathanathibdishrth ph s 2563 thirththng 50 rthaelaekhtokhlmebiycaekharwm 2 rthephnsileweniyaelaeluxkprathanathibdiinkhnaphueluxktngtamkhaaennkhwamniym rthephnsileweniymi 20 esiynginkhnaphueluxktng 3 inwnthi 7 phvscikaynmikarkhadkarnwaibedinchnakareluxktnginrthephnsileweniyaelaekhaidrbkarprakasihepnphuchnakareluxktng 4 kareluxktngprathanathibdishrthinrthephnsileweniy ph s 2563 2016 3 phvscikayn ph s 2563 2024 phuichsiththi khaaennesiyng99 n ewla Nov 19 2020 3 21 pm EST 1 phuthaching oc ibedin dxnld thrmpphrrkh edomaekhrt riphbliknrthehya edlaaewr flxridakhusmkhr kmla aehrris imk ephnskhaaennkhnaphueluxktng 20 0khaaennesiyng 3 456 632 3 375 636rxyla 49 97 48 79 prathanathibdikxnkareluxktngdxnld thrmpriphblikn wathiprathanathibdi oc ibedinedomaekhrt enuxha 1 karkhadkarn 2 karsarwc 2 1 karsrupodykraf 2 2 karsarwcodyrwm 2 3 aebbsarwc 3 phl 4 hmayehtu 5 xangxingkarkhadkarn aekikhthima xndb wnthiPrinceton Electoral Consortium 5 Safe D phlikchna 5 tulakhm ph s 2563The Cook Political Report 6 Lean D phlikchna 5 tulakhm ph s 2563Inside Elections 7 Lean D phlikchna 5 tulakhm ph s 2563Sabato s Crystal Ball 8 Lean D phlikchna 5 tulakhm ph s 2563Politico 9 Lean D phlikchna 5 tulakhm ph s 2563RCP 10 Tossup 5 tulakhm ph s 2563Niskanen 11 Likely D phlikchna 5 tulakhm ph s 2563CNN 12 Lean D phlikchna 23 tulakhm ph s 2563The Economist 13 Likely D phlikchna 5 tulakhm ph s 2563CBS News 14 Lean D phlikchna 5 tulakhm ph s 2563270towin 15 Lean D phlikchna 5 tulakhm ph s 2563ABC News 16 Likely D phlikchna 5 tulakhm ph s 2563NPR 17 Lean D phlikchna 5 tulakhm ph s 2563NBC News 18 Lean D phlikchna 5 tulakhm ph s 2563538 19 Likely D phlikchna 5 tulakhm ph s 2563karsarwc aekikhkarsrupodykraf aekikh karsarwcodyrwm aekikh Source of pollaggregation Dates administered Dates updated JoeBidenDemocratic DonaldTrumpRepublican Other Undecided a Margin270 to Win October 22 November 2 2020 November 3 2020 49 4 45 7 4 9 Biden 3 7Real Clear Politics October 29 November 2 2020 November 3 2020 48 7 47 5 3 8 Biden 1 2FiveThirtyEight until November 2 2020 November 3 2020 50 2 45 6 4 2 Biden 4 6Average 49 4 46 3 4 3 Biden 3 1aebbsarwc aekikh Poll source Date s administered Samplesize b Marginof error DonaldTrumpRepublican JoeBidenDemocratic JoJorgensenLibertarian HowieHawkinsGreen Other UndecidedSusquehanna Polling amp Research Inc Nov 1 2 499 LV 4 3 49 c 48 1 0 d 0 Pulse Opinion Research Rasmussen Reports Oct 31 Nov 1 800 LV 3 5 47 e 50 1 f Research Co Oct 31 Nov 1 450 LV 4 6 46 52 2 g 4 AYTM Aspiration Oct 30 Nov 1 340 LV 49 51 Change Research CNBC Oct 29 Nov 1 699 LV 3 71 46 50 2 2 Marist College NBC Oct 29 Nov 1 772 LV 4 4 46 51 1 2 Monmouth University Oct 28 Nov 1 502 RV 4 4 45 50 1 0 h 4 502 LV 44 i 51 45 j 50 Swayable Oct 27 Nov 1 1 107 LV 3 9 48 50 2 Data for Progress Oct 27 Nov 1 1 417 LV 2 6 45 52 2 0 0 k Ipsos Reuters Oct 27 Nov 1 673 LV 4 3 45 l 51 1 1 2 m 44 n 51 3 o 2 46 p 52 2 q Trafalgar Oct 30 31 1 062 LV 2 93 48 46 2 1 r 4 Frederick Polls Compete Everywhere A Oct 30 31 879 LV 3 48 52 Insider Advantage Center for American Greatness B Oct 30 31 500 LV 4 4 48 7 47 4 1 3 2 6 Siena College NYT Upshot Oct 26 31 1 862 LV 2 4 43 49 2 0 s 5 t Morning Consult Oct 22 31 2 686 LV 2 43 52 Emerson College Oct 29 30 823 LV 3 3 47 u 52 2 v AtlasIntel Oct 29 30 672 LV 4 50 49 2 Targoz Market Research PollSmart Oct 25 30 998 LV 42 56 2 w Public Policy Polling American Bridge PAC C Oct 28 29 1 012 V 45 52 3 Redfield amp Wilton Strategies Oct 26 29 2 125 LV 45 50 1 1 3 Harvard Harris The Hill Oct 26 29 901 LV 46 51 3 ABC Washington Post Oct 24 29 824 LV 4 44 51 3 0 x 1 Muhlenberg College Morning Call Oct 23 28 419 LV 5 5 44 49 4 y 2 SurveyMonkey Axios Oct 1 28 10 599 LV 1 5 46 52 RMG Research PoliticalIQ Oct 25 27 800 LV 3 5 45 l 51 2 2 44 z 52 2 2 47 aa 49 2 2 Quinnipiac University Oct 23 27 1 324 LV 2 7 44 51 1 ab 4 Swayable Oct 23 26 491 LV 6 46 52 2 Civiqs Daily Kos Oct 23 26 1 145 LV 3 45 52 2 ac 1 Ipsos Reuters Oct 20 26 655 LV 4 4 44 l 51 3 0 1 ad 45 ae 50 3 af 2 Insider Advantage Center for American Greatness B Oct 25 400 LV 4 9 48 5 45 5 3 3 2 8 Trafalgar Group Oct 24 25 1 076 LV 2 91 48 48 2 1 ag 1 Wick Surveys Oct 24 25 1 000 LV 3 1 49 47 Franklin amp Marshall College Oct 19 25 558 LV 5 44 50 2 1 ah 3 Univision University of Houston LatinoDecisions North Star Opinion Research Oct 17 25 723 RV 3 64 45 50 3 ai 2 Gravis Marketing Oct 23 602 LV 4 44 51 5 Public Policy Polling American Bridge PAC D Oct 21 22 980 V 46 51 4 Civiqs Dan Hopkins Oct 17 21 1 577 A 3 46 52 2 YouGov University of Wisconsin Madison Oct 13 21 669 LV 4 45 44 52 3 aj Citizen Data Oct 17 20 1 000 LV 3 1 39 44 9 0 1 7 CNN SSRS Oct 15 20 843 LV 4 43 53 2 1 ak 1 Muhlenberg College Morning Call Oct 13 20 416 LV 5 5 44 51 2 al 4 Morning Consult Oct 11 20 2 563 LV 1 9 43 52 Fox News Oct 18 19 1 045 LV 3 45 50 1 1 am 2 Pulse Opinion Research Rasmussen Reports Oct 18 19 800 LV 3 5 47 50 2 an 3 Quinnipiac University Oct 16 19 1 241 LV 2 8 43 51 1 ao 5 Change Research CNBC Oct 16 19 574 LV ap 47 49 Suffolk University USA Today 1 Oct 15 19 500 LV 4 4 42 49 1 4 aq 4 Ipsos Reuters Oct 13 19 653 LV 4 4 45 l 49 2 0 3 ar 45 as 49 3 at 4 Trafalgar Group Restoration PAC E Oct 13 15 1 041 LV 2 96 46 48 3 2 au 2 HarrisX The Hill Oct 12 15 1 289 LV 46 51 Insider Advantage Center for American Greatness B Oct 12 13 400 LV 4 9 43 46 2 9 Redfield amp Wilton Strategies Oct 10 13 1 289 LV 43 ap 51 1 0 Trafalgar Group Oct 10 12 1 034 LV 2 97 45 47 3 3 av 2 RMG Research PoliticalIQ Oct 7 12 800 LV 43 l 49 1 1 6 42 aw 50 1 1 6 45 ax 47 1 1 6 Civiqs Rust Belt Rising F Oct 8 11 600 LV 4 2 45 52 2 ay 1 Ipsos Reuters Oct 6 11 622 LV 4 5 45 l 51 1 0 2 az 44 ba 51 1 bb 4 Morning Consult Oct 2 11 2 610 LV 1 9 44 52 Redfield amp Wilton Strategies Oct 9 10 1 145 LV 44 ap 49 1 Whitman Insight Strategies Oct 5 9 517 LV 4 3 46 51 1 bc 3 Baldwin Wallace University Sep 30 Oct 8 1 140 LV 3 1 45 50 1 0 0 bd 4 YouGov CCES Sep 29 Oct 7 2 703 LV 44 52 Redfield amp Wilton Strategies Oct 4 6 927 LV 3 22 42 49 1 1 be 7 Emerson College Oct 4 5 688 LV 3 7 47 bf 51 2 bg Quinnipiac University Oct 1 5 1 211 LV 2 8 41 54 1 bh 3 Ipsos Reuters Sep 29 Oct 5 605 LV 4 5 45 50 2 bi 3 Change Research CNBC Oct 2 4 468 LV 46 50 Monmouth University Sep 30 Oct 4 500 RV 4 4 42 54 1 0 bj 2 500 LV 43 bk 54 45 bl 53 YouGov CBS Sep 30 Oct 2 1 287 LV 3 2 44 51 2 bm 5 Siena College NYT Upshot Sep 30 Oct 2 706 LV 4 1 42 49 3 0 bn 5 bo SurveyMonkey Axios Sep 1 30 4 613 LV 46 52 2 ABC News Washington Post Sep 21 26 567 LV 5 0 45 54 0 bp 1 Siena College NYT Upshot Sep 25 27 711 LV 4 3 40 49 2 0 bq 8 br TIPP The Federalist Sep 24 26 774 LV 3 6 45 50 1 bs 4 Redfield amp Wilton Strategies Sep 23 25 1 015 LV 3 08 44 50 0 1 bt 5 Fox News Sep 20 23 856 LV 3 44 51 2 1 bu 2 910 RV 3 43 51 2 2 bv 3 Baldwin Wallace University Sep 9 22 1 012 LV 3 6 45 47 2 0 1 bw 5 Trafalgar Group Restoration PAC E Sep 18 21 1 006 LV 2 99 46 48 1 1 2 bx 2 YouGov UW Madison Elections ResearchCenter Wisconsin State Journal Sep 10 21 642 LV 45 49 Change Research CNBC Sep 18 20 579 LV 45 49 Franklin amp Marshall College Sep 14 20 480 LV 7 8 42 48 Hart Research Associates Human Rights Campaign G Sep 17 19 400 LV 4 9 42 53 CPEC H Sep 15 17 830 LV 2 3 45 50 1 by 4 Trafalgar Group R Sep 15 17 1 006 LV 2 99 45 47 2 1 2 bz 2 Ipsos Reuters Sep 11 16 611 LV 4 5 46 49 2 ca 4 Civiqs Rust Belt Rising F Sep 11 15 704 RV 4 4 45 52 1 cb 2 Redfield amp Wilton Strategies Sep 12 14 1 036 LV 3 04 44 49 1 1 0 cc 5 Climate Nexus Sep 8 11 659 RV 4 43 48 3 cd 6 Benenson Strategy Group GS Strategy Group AARP Aug 28 Sep 8 1 600 LV 2 5 46 49 1 ce 4 Marist College NBC News Aug 31 Sep 7 771 LV 4 4 44 53 1 2 Morning Consult Aug 29 Sep 7 2 227 LV 2 4 45 cf 50 Change Research CNBC Sep 4 6 829 LV 46 50 4 cg TargetSmart Sep 3 6 835 LV 3 4 44 51 3 3 Susquehanna Polling amp Research Inc Aug 26 Sep 4 498 LV 4 3 42 44 6 ch 7 Redfield amp Wilton Strategies Aug 30 Sep 3 1 053 LV 3 02 43 48 1 1 1 ci 7 Quinnipiac Aug 28 Sep 1 1 235 LV 3 44 52 1 cj 3 ALG Research Progressive Policy Institute I Aug 26 Sep 1 500 LV 44 50 Monmouth University Aug 28 31 400 RV 4 9 45 49 2 0 1 ck 4 400 LV 46 cl 49 2 3 47 cm 48 2 3 Hodas amp Associates Restoration PAC E Aug 26 31 600 LV 45 51 4 SurveyMonkey Axios Aug 1 31 3 531 LV 45 53 2 Morning Consult Aug 21 30 2 158 LV 2 4 45 49 Pulse Opinion Research Rasmussen Reports Aug 25 27 1 000 LV 3 48 cn 48 4 co GQR Research Unite the Country PAC J Aug 20 24 971 LV 4 4 43 52 5 Franklin amp Marshall College Aug 17 24 681 RV 5 2 42 cp 50 3 cq 7 Change Research CNBC Aug 21 23 984 LV 46 49 Global Strategy Group Climate Power 2020 League of Conservation Voters Sierra Club K Aug 13 19 801 RV 3 5 42 l 50 2 1 5 43 cr 53 4 Redfield and Wilton Strategies Aug 16 17 1 006 LV 3 1 41 48 1 1 1 cs 8 Civiqs Rust Belt Rising F Aug 13 17 617 RV 44 51 3 ct 1 Muhlenberg College Morning Call Aug 11 17 416 LV 5 5 45 49 3 cu 3 Morning Consult Aug 7 16 1 777 LV 2 4 44 50 Emerson College Aug 8 10 843 LV 3 8 47 cv 53 Change Research CNBC Aug 7 9 456 RV 44 48 YouGov CBS Aug 4 7 1 211 LV 3 7 43 49 3 cw 5 OnMessage Inc Heritage Action L Aug 2 4 400 LV 4 7 46 50 4 YouGov University of Wisconsin Madison Jul 27 Aug 6 742 RV 4 9 41 50 2 cx 5 SurveyMonkey Axios Jul 1 31 4 208 LV 48 50 2 Change Research CNBC 2 Jul 24 26 382 LV 46 48 Franklin amp Marshall College Jul 20 26 667 RV 5 5 41 50 2 cy 6 Morning Consult Jul 17 26 2 092 LV 2 1 42 50 Gravis Marketing 3 Jul 22 24 1 006 RV 3 1 45 48 8 Zogby Analytics Jul 21 23 809 RV 3 4 43 44 4 2 8 Hodas amp Associates Restoration PAC E Jul 17 22 600 LV 45 51 5 Redfield amp Wilton Strategies Jul 19 21 1 016 LV 41 48 1 0 2 cz 8 Fox News Jul 18 20 793 RV 3 5 39 50 5 da 6 Pulse Opinion Research Rasmussen Reports American Greatness PAC B Jul 15 16 750 LV 4 46 51 2 db 1 Spry Strategies American Principles Project M Jul 11 16 700 LV 3 7 48 47 5 Monmouth University Jul 9 13 401 RV 4 9 40 53 3 dc 4 401 LV 42 dd 52 3 3 44 de 51 2 3 Change Research CNBC Jul 10 12 743 LV 42 50 Trafalgar Group Jun 29 Jul 2 1 062 LV 2 92 43 48 6 df 3 SurveyMonkey Axios Jun 8 30 2 184 LV 48 50 2 Change Research CNBC Jun 26 28 760 LV ap 44 50 Susquehanna Polling Fox 43 Jun 15 23 715 LV 41 46 5 8 Redfield amp Wilton Strategies Jun 14 16 1 125 LV 2 92 39 49 1 1 1 dg 9 Siena College NYT Upshot Jun 8 16 651 RV 4 2 40 50 3 dh 6 Change Research CNBC Jun 12 14 491 LV ap 46 49 3 di Hodas amp Associates Restoration PAC E Jun 8 11 600 LV 4 0 42 54 4 Civiqs Dan Hopkins Jun 6 11 1 221 A 3 6 46 49 5 Civiqs Dan Hopkins May 30 Jun 2 2 045 A 2 4 46 49 5 Change Research CNBC May 29 31 579 LV ap 50 46 2 2 Morning Consult May 17 26 2 120 LV 44 ap 48 Redfield amp Wilton Strategies May 10 14 963 LV 3 2 39 48 2 dj 11 Hodas amp Associates Restoration PAC E May 9 13 600 LV 3 0 51 46 4 Harper Polling R Apr 21 26 644 LV 3 9 43 49 8 Public Policy Polling N Apr 20 21 1 251 RV 44 51 5 Fox News Apr 18 21 803 RV 3 5 42 50 Ipsos Apr 15 20 578 RV 5 0 40 46 Suquehanna Research Fox 43 Apr 14 20 693 LV 42 48 Hodas amp Associates Restoration PAC E Apr 16 18 600 RV 3 0 47 47 6 Civiqs Dan Hopkins Apr 4 8 1 912 A 2 5 47 47 6 Baldwin Wallace University Great Lakes Mar 17 25 973 RV 3 9 47 45 9 Change Research Mar 21 23 510 LV 50 47 4 Hodas amp Associates Restoration PAC E Mar 19 21 600 RV 47 45 Civiqs Dan Hopkins Mar 14 18 1 589 A 2 7 48 46 6 YouGov Yahoo News Mar 6 8 725 RV 40 46 5 dk 8 Firehouse Strategies Optimus Mar 5 7 533 RV 5 3 45 44 Civiqs Dan Hopkins Feb 27 Mar 3 2 462 A 2 2 48 46 7 Muhlenberg College Morning Call Feb 12 20 424 RV 5 5 47 47 2 4 YouGov Feb 11 20 1 171 RV 4 0 45 46 Quinnipiac University Feb 12 18 849 RV 3 4 42 50 6 dl 3 Expedition Strategies Progressive Policies Institute Feb 6 18 500 RV 42 47 11 phl aekikhkareluxktngprathanathibdishrthinrthephnsileweniy ph s 2563 20 phrrkh phusmkhr khaaennesiyng edomaekhrt Joe BidenKamala Harris 3 450 696 49 98 2 52 riphblikn Donald TrumpMike Pence 3 368 278 48 78 0 4 liebxretheriyn Jo JorgensenSpike Cohen 79 186 1 15 1 23 ekhiynlng 6 680 0 10 0 11 Total votes 6 904 840hmayehtu aekikhPartisan clients Compete Everywhere primarily supports Democratic candidates 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 The Center for American Greatness is a pro Trump organization Climate Power 2020 was created by the League of Conservation Voters which endorsed Biden prior to the sampling period The American Bridge PAC exclusively supports Democratic candidates 5 0 5 1 5 2 5 3 5 4 5 5 5 6 5 7 The Restoration PAC is a 501 non profit which supports Donald Trump s 2020 presidential campaign 6 0 6 1 6 2 Rust Belt Rising is affiliated with the Democratic Party The Human Rights Campaign endorsed Biden prior to this poll s sampling period CPEC campaigns exclusively for Democratic candidates The Progressive Policy Institute endorsed Biden prior to this poll s sampling period Unite the Country PAC endorsed Biden prior to this poll s sampling period The League of Conservation Voters and the Sierra Club endorsed Biden prior to this poll s sampling period Heritage Action is the sister organisation of the Heritage Foundation which exclusively endorses Republican candidates This poll s sponsor is the American Principles Project a 501 c 4 organization that supports the Republican Party Poll sponsored by Protect Our Care a pro Affordable Care Act organisation Additional candidates Calculated by taking the difference of 100 and all other candidates combined Key A all adultsRV registered votersLV likely votersV unclear With voters who lean towards a given candidate Would not vote with 0 With voters who lean towards a given candidate Some other candidate with 1 Someone else with 2 Other candidate and No one with 0 With a likely voter turnout model featuring high turnout With a likely voter turnout model featuring low turnout Other candidate or write in with 0 12 0 12 1 12 2 12 3 12 4 12 5 12 6 Standard VI response West B with 2 Some other candidate and would not vote with 0 If only Biden Trump and some other candidate were available Some other candidate with 3 would not vote with 0 Results considering those who lean towards a given candidate among those initially predisposed towards abstention indecision or a candidate besides Biden or Trump in the response section immediately above Some other candidate with 2 Someone else with 1 Someone else and would not vote with 0 Includes Refused With voters who lean towards a given candidate Someone else with 2 Not sure Someone else Undecided with 2 None of these and Other with 0 would not vote with no voters Neither other with 4 Results generated with high Democratic turnout model Results generated with high Republican turnout model Someone else with 1 Someone else with 2 Some other candidate with 1 West B and would not vote with 0 If only Biden Trump and some other candidate were available Some other candidate with 3 would not vote with 0 Someone else with 1 Refused with 1 Some other candidate with 0 Someone else with 3 Includes Undecided Other with 1 None of these with 0 Neither other with 2 Other with 1 would not vote with no voters Some other candidate with 2 Someone else with 1 42 0 42 1 42 2 42 3 42 4 42 5 42 6 Additional data sourced from FiveThirtyEight Refused with 3 Others with 1 Some other candidate with 2 West B with 1 would not vote with 0 If only Biden Trump and some other candidate were available Some other candidate with 3 would not vote with 0 Someone else with 2 Someone else with 3 Results generated with high Democratic turnout model Results generated with high Republican turnout model Someone else with 2 Some other candidate and would not vote with 1 West B with 0 If only Biden Trump and some other candidate were available Some other candidate with 1 would not vote with 0 Someone else with 1 Another candidate with 0 Another Third Party Write in with 1 With voters who lean towards a given candidate Someone else with 2 Someone else with 1 Some other candidate with 2 would not vote with 0 Other candidate and No one with 0 With a likely voter turnout model featuring high turnout With a likely voter turnout model featuring low turnout Someone else third party with 2 Someone else and would not vote with 0 Includes Refused Neither and Other with 0 would not vote with no voters Someone else and would not vote with 0 Includes Refused Other with 1 Prefer not to answer with 0 Another Third Party Write in with 1 Other with 1 would not vote with no voters Other and would not vote with 1 Another candidate with 1 Someone else with 2 Third party candidate with 1 Someone else with 2 Some other candidate with 2 would not vote with 0 Someone else with 1 Another Third Party Write in with 0 Neither candidate or other candidate with 3 Would not vote with 1 Overlapping sample with the previous Morning Consult poll but more information available regarding sample size Other not sure with 4 Other and Refused with 3 Another Third Party Write in with 1 Someone else with 1 No one with 1 Other candidate with no voters With a likely voter turnout model featuring higher turnout than in the 2016 presidential election With a likely voter turnout model featuring lower turnout than in the 2016 presidential election Additional data sourced from FiveThirtyEight with voters who lean towards a given candidate Some other candidate with 4 With voters who lean towards a given candidate Some other candidate with 3 If only Biden and Trump were candidates Another Third Party Write in with 1 Someone else with 3 Neither other with 3 Including voters who lean towards a given candidate Someone else third party with 3 Other with 2 would not vote with 0 Some other candidate with 2 West B and Another Third Party Write In with 1 Other with 4 would not vote with 1 Some other candidate with 2 Another candidate with 3 No one with 0 With a likely voter turnout model featuring higher turnout than in the 2016 presidential election With a likely voter turnout model featuring lower turnout than in the 2016 presidential election Other party candidate with 6 other with 1 Another candidate with 2 would not vote with 1 Libertarian Party candidate Green Party candidate with 3 Third party write in with 2 Other with 2 would not vote with 3 Someone else with 1 would not vote with 5 xangxing aekikh Pennsylvania Election Results 2020 The New York Times subkhnemux 5 November 2020 Kelly Ben August 13 2018 US elections key dates When are the 2018 midterms and the 2020 presidential campaign The Independent subkhnemux January 3 2019 Distribution of Electoral Votes National Archives and Records Administration subkhnemux January 3 2019 CNN Stephen Collinson and Maeve Reston Biden wins Pennsylvania becoming the 46th president of the United States CNN subkhnemux 2020 11 07 2020 Electoral Maps from Princeton Election Consortium Princeton University phasaxngkvs subkhnemux 2020 09 22 2020 POTUS Race ratings PDF The Cook Political Report phasaxngkvs subkhnemux 2019 05 21 POTUS Ratings Inside Elections insideelections com subkhnemux 2019 05 21 Larry J Sabato s Crystal Ball 2020 President crystalball centerforpolitics org subkhnemux 2019 05 21 2020 Election Forecast Politico November 19 2019 Battle for White House RCP April 19 2019 2020 Bitecofer Model Electoral College Predictions Niskanen Center March 24 2020 retrieved April 19 2020 David Chalian Terence Burlij Road to 270 CNN s debut Electoral College map for 2020 CNN subkhnemux 2020 06 16 Forecasting the US elections The Economist subkhnemux 7 July 2020 2020 Election Battleground Tracker CBS News July 12 2020 subkhnemux July 13 2020 2020 Presidential Election Interactive Map 270 to Win ABC News Race Ratings ABC News July 24 2020 subkhnemux July 24 2020 2020 Electoral Map Ratings Trump Slides Biden Advantage Expands Over 270 Votes NPR org phasaxngkvs subkhnemux 2020 08 03 Biden dominates the electoral map but here s how the race could tighten NBC News phasaxngkvs subkhnemux 2020 08 06 2020 Election Forecast FiveThirtyEight subkhnemux 14 August 2020 Pennsylvania 2020 General Election Green Papers subkhnemux 2020 09 17 ekhathungcak https th wikipedia org w index php title kareluxktngprathanathibdishrthinrthephnsileweniy ph s 2563 amp oldid 9145313, wikipedia, วิกิ หนังสือ, หนังสือ, ห้องสมุด,

บทความ

, อ่าน, ดาวน์โหลด, ฟรี, ดาวน์โหลดฟรี, mp3, วิดีโอ, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, รูปภาพ, เพลง, เพลง, หนัง, หนังสือ, เกม, เกม